OK, this is somewhat a controversial idea in making a movie of a whistleblower like that. How about a fucking book or a fucking documentary about him? But a movie of him? HOW? The serious downside of this idea is that there may be fictional characters working at the government agencies we already know of in addition to non-fictional ones working on some bad technologies where they will be eventually leaked by him and he will be on the run after that. Another serious problem is that those agencies may somewhat threaten the ones behind this movie to cancel it. Perhaps, they may be some fears that there may be his successors or whatever in the future. Third controversy is that he's already on the run and his alybss or whatever is not going to last even longer before he gets his ass arrested. And if that's the case, there may be some actor playing the role of that whistleblower which is sacrificing everything in the first place.
The movie is based on the book made by some journalist about the on-going cyber-spying saga but that's not enough that the one behind that book has to make even more chapters of new information. It will be out sometime next year and we don't know if this is going to be a global release. Speaking of global release, it's going to be a forth controversy about the movie. It may be banned in certain countries although it provides the impression that will change the way the movie viewers use the internet. OK, what about those who haven't watched? Will they know something that will require some check-before-change process? OK, Check-Before-Change is some term I have come out with. What this means is that you have to check everything for requirement of change but the downside of this term is that there may be bad changes as well as if this term has been used by many corporations and agencies.
It's not gonna be that great! STOP THAT! Focus on other media ways to protect people online!
